only arrogant people have websites
Books
What of “Great Minds”? Quote Day.
Mar 25th
“Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.”
It’s disputed that Eleanor Roosevelt actually said that, however, it’s a very interesting thought.
We all know the tween or teenage mind that incessantly gossip and talk about other people.
Many never leave that stage of life, if it’s an evolutionary stage at all. We will discuss that later.

We also all know those who read about events, current or historical.

These are the knee-jerk’rs in life; observe and react, observe and react, observe and react: observe something judged as bad or unwanted-react-and feel bad or angry. They don’t yet have enough power or self control to direct their own thoughts. These are the critics, complainers, whiners, commentators, skeptics, cynics, it reminds me of a quote Quinn pointed out to me:
“Doubters do not achieve; skeptics do not contribute; cynics do not create.” Calvin Coolidge
These are the people who adamantly think they are the smartest people in the world. They will scoff at any who are tried up in pop-culture. They are primarily fed on distorted lies and propaganda the news feeds them, they take it in from all sources they can so they can claim to be “unbiased” AM talk radio, political commentators and shock jockeys, etc. That like to point out what’s wrong, and – even better – what will not work. They don’t really have any answers. They never do anything about it other than complain, and join groups of other like minded complainers to join their voices and fight against unwanted things.
Then there are those in which the small minds roll their eyes at and think are boring and the average minds probably think are way-up-there-in-the-clouds with all their crazy ideas; the great minds.

They are sort of fridge dwellers. They are not hermits, they are part of every day society, they are just more visionaries than observationists. George Bernard Shaw confirms this whole line of thinking with his famous quote, “Some look at things that are, and ask why. I dream of things that never were and ask why not?”
These are the ones who do pay attention to what is, but just enough to give them a launching point into what IS wanted rather than hang out in unwanted things. They are the ones who cure diseases, solve problems, invent things that have never been before. I am reminded of the story of a man who, much against the adamant advice of his neighbors, told him NOT to take his entire life savings go to Detroit and buy a new Ford only to take it apart. The man’s name was Chrysler, yes there is a skyscraper named after him (The Chrysler Building). There is yet to be any skyscrapers with the names of the cynical neighbors on it. However, there are some dusty six foot holes in the ground with their names displayed above.
I personally couldn’t be happier anywhere in the world than deep inside a leading edge discussion about new ideas and thoughts. Does that mean I have a “great mind”? Is such a conversation more “higher minded” than pop-culture or current events? I like what Aaron said to the affect that in regarding that quote at the beginning, ” Whoever said that quote, just espoused themselves that ideas are the pinnacle of thought.” Talking about other people, or focusing on events could actually be the pinnacle of human thought; I’m not trying to disparage anyone who enjoys such conversation or topic.
So I don’t know if I will entirely recant passing along the advice millionaires have given me to read what looks like the the best life changing books on the best sellers list. This is a very narrow topic which is primarily philosophical, spiritual and meta-physical in nature. Sometimes you need a specific answer rather than one based on quantum physics. If you go to a surgeon, she will cut. If you go to a baker, he or she will bake. If you to a philosopher, he or she will … pontificate? The point is if we were all on the same level, we’d only need a single teacher.
I never like to ‘should on’ people, but I will now: Whatever gives you joy in life, you should seek. Since “ask and it is given” is still in effect, then following your own guidance and bliss (Joseph Campbell) will always lead you perfectly to what you’ve asked for. While following the advice I passed along was meant for me and my path – not for you and yours. If your personal dominate intent is to be joyful (and it should be!) then you will find people to talk about, or events to interest you, or ideas that thrill you, help you create and make your heart sing.
A Case for “Best-Selling” Book Lists
Mar 23rd

Early on, a mentor once suggested that I check out Amazon.com‘s and New York Time’s Best Selling Non-Fiction Best Selling Lists for some of the best life changing books. I hesitated because I did not think I really cared to read what the mindless drone masses thought was good, I only wanted to know what the cognitive elite and most successful people thought. I took the advice anyways, and started to plow though the lists, even going back into the 1930′s and before, reading every title that looked promising or was the #1 book for that year or decade. I was blown away at the high quality of many of them. The biggest questions that struck me were along the same lines of:
- Why don’t more people know what’s in this book?
- This must be common knowledge now, why are so many people not aware of it?
I just could not wrap my head around why certain ideas that were so prevalent, with millions of copies sold in the world was not more into mainstream though. For instance the best selling health book of the entire 1970′s was no where in the American Health Care system – I just couldn’t figure it out. Now, here is where I was wrong: It’s not the masses of mindless masses that even read books. Here are some figures I’ve gathered that point out exactly who is reading, and who is not:
- 99% of people don’t buy books
- The average Fortune 500 CEO reads 4 to 5 books per month (and makes over 500 times what the average book reader person makes…)
- The average person buys 1 book a year
- The number of people who will not read past the first chapter …60%-98% depending on the book
- 54% of people never read another non-fiction book outside of school for the rest of their lives.
- National Endowment for the Arts report titled “Reading at Risk” found only 57 percent of American adults had claimed to have read a book in 2002. This figure is most likely grossly inflated.
- 95% of people, basically, don’t read books
So the advice given to me to check out the best sellers lists for the best life changing books was solid advice. It is NOT the mindless masses reading these books, it’s basically the top 1-5%.
It’s true though, most of the subjects on those lists do not really appeal to me; I do not care about politics, some biographies of some pop-star, the latest fad diet or someone complaining and fighting against unwanted things. But there are real jems there, and I will heartily pass on the advice. One more fact:
- The average American by the age of 60 has watched 15 years of television.
In Defense of Food – Book Review – Debunking Nutritionism *****
Mar 9th
I do not write book reviews on my blog anymore, because nobody cares to read though hundreds of reviews. I will make an exception with this one, because it’s one of the best of all time. Michael Pollan in “In Defense of Food” so thoroughly, so completely, so conclusively, so extensively, DEBUNKS “nutritionism” that is deserves to be called one of the best. This is a mainstream book too; when I point people to no-name doctors that debunk it just doesn’t have enough clout as someone who writes for NY Times I suppose. But it’s another sign that things are getting better and better. Why this one is so good is because you can henceforth throw out about 95% of ALL OTHER HEALTH AND DIET BOOKS. It explains how faulty the science is, primarily behind as he calls it “Nutritionism”. Nutritionism is the new reductionist “science” of figuring out that people are more healthy when they eat, oh let’s say carrots. So they try to break down carrots into their micro and macro nutrient parts. They figure out it’s got a whole lot of carotenes in it, primarily the beta. So they either try to take the carotene out, or synthetically make it, bottle it and sell it. The problem is, there are hundred of other carotenes in it. The people don’t thrive on the pills like they do on the actual carrots, non the less, most health books, science and government regulations will say “you need to have 500mg of β-Carotene a week. “ The advice continues and basically you can eat some nasty tasting veggies mono-culturally grown in depleted soils with pesticides (yuck) or you can just pop this shinny pill and call yourself good. Except vitamins mostly prove to be expensive urine as your body can’t or does not absorb them like they do with a carrot. Just about everyone who has lived outside of the USA confirms all fruits, veggies meats and milk taste better. Pollan also points out how every single world diet including ones rich in meats, fats, and milks people thrive on and have but a fraction of the disease we have here…except one; the western diet.
I heard Pollan lecture at the U of U, he talked about how nutritionism is just in it’s infancy of science. So any book that has you taking supplements (ahem ALL of the Oprah popular “YOU” Manuals) you can throw them out the window and worthless bunk propagated by the sellers of supplements.
Here is another example of Nutritionism:
This is a chromatogram showing the difference between ascorbic acid and the whole vitamin C complex. Vitamin C is on the left and ascorbic acid on the right. Ascortic acid is only one part of the Vitaimin C complex. The ascorbic acid is synthetic and derived from corn, the food industry has paid off the FDA to call it the same thing, because using the pre-school tools of Nutritionism, it looks similar, I will admit it’s similar. But when doctors started recommending synthetic products that were nutritionally “identically” to the real thing, they had no affect and nobody knew why.
And still nobody quite knows why. They think it also has to do with synergy, but they take try (key word) to all the nutrients out of the fruit or veggie, and put them in the correct ratio, but still it has no effect.
So there is an X factor to nutritionism that nobody has figured out yet. There is an energy to natural foods that we have not been able to measure yet. I suppose it’s from the sun. The closest thing I have seen, that doesn’t measure but may show the energy or X factor difference is kirlian photography:
But who really knows, Kirlian photography may just be a giant coincidence; it’s the only thing that correlates food that you will thrive on vs food that you will get sick on. But considering all things we can agree upon is we need real food (non processed) to thrive, and to help prevent and cure all diseases. Regardless of your beliefs, there was some sort of intelligence that guided our evolution here, and provided everything we’d need here. We haven’t yet been able to make a single blade of grass, or a smattering of new life. Sure we can squash out life, or copy life, or modify existing life, but we haven’t yet figure out how to put or make new life with our science. So trust in the food that is already here, and leave it as it was meant to be. I’ve read Omnivores Dilemma too, His advice is, ” Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.” Not taking a dozens of supplements a week, as if whatever intelligence organized us here TOTALLY forgot about something. I highly recommend the book, just so you can throw away just about 95% EVERY SINGLE other health book out there on diet based on Nutritionism or bases getting healthy based on supplements.
Crime keeps going….up?
Jun 11th

For the 16th consecutive year, according to the FBI’s June 1, 2009 report, the Nation “as a whole” reports:
- 2.5 percent decrease in the # of violent crimes
- 1.6 percent decrease in the # of property crimes
- 3.9 percent decrease in the # of arson
From year end 2007 to year end 2008.
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/08aprelim/
However, if you watch the news agencies, you may think differently. What is the premise or thesis of news? Let’s ask them. News reporting agencies statements:
Fiction, (What they claim): It’s a fair and accurate reporting of what is going on in the world today.
Fact, (What they really mean): We comb the world over with a microscope looking for the smallest pockets of bad stuff happening, in order to jolt you to emotionally feel bad and disallow the well-being that is naturally yours thereby getting you into a fearful and lackful void feeling state while getting you in the mindset that buying things will fill that void we inspired and thereby buy stuff from our sponsors thereby lining our pocket$ under the pretense of “serving the public good by reporting news that’s a fair, balanced and accurate representation of what is going on in the world today”
So while it’s “true” that those things are happening, using their premise is entirely false. They say the best lies are 99% truth. How many people are willing to sit down and be lied to for hours on end? Apparently, a lot.

If a ball is 99.999% white, and there is 0.0001% black and someone with a microscope focusing on the black specs reports to you that the ball is 95% (ratio of negative to positive news stories) is black, you’d be more than a little hesitant. It’s blatantly obvious the ball is mostly white. If they were telling you “That’s the way it is” or “That is your ball color today” or “This is a fair, accurate, and well balanced report on the color of this ball,” that is a bold faced lie. Very bold. And you’d feel it’s wrong from what you know innately. But if they said it to you with a smile and a pretty face, you’d be more inclined to believe it. However most people would start to believe that the ball is indeed black after sheer countless repartition and other news stations are reporting the same thing; the above ball is mostly black. When, without the microscope focusing on only the black, the ball is clearly not black. Not even close. Not even by a long shot. And this is the problem: while the crime rate IS going down, the reporting of crime has gone up: 1,600%+ more.
The world is getting better and better. For ever act of “evil” there is a million acts of kindness. Crime is going down, the number of armed conflicts in 2000 vs 2008 went from 25 to 14. The well-being is overwhelmingly dominant. Sure you can find a crust of bread in the garbage dump, but you probably don’t need the reputation – while the news may be entertaining, it’s a disserving you. “Well, I like to be lied to every night, and bits throughout the day, it’s fun.” I promise you there are better ways to spend the time you have on this planet.
People ask with a sort twinge of disbelieve, like they are conversing with a backwoods hermit from the 60′s,
“How do you live without paying attention to the news?” aka “How can you live without someone telling you the white ball is actually mostly black?”
Quite well actually.
On a side note, similar topic, you didn’t come into this time/space reality to watch the tv/news. True, while David Letterman said “Everyone has a purpose in life, maybe yours is watching television” it may not be your personal purpose. They calculate how much of your life is spent sleeping, at work, in the bathroom, waiting in lines (traffic, shopping, etc), and after it’s all said and done, you get about two hours a day. That is two hours of L-I-F-E. That’s the essence of life, the juice of life, entirely yours delicious life, no obligations, absolute freedom you can do whatever you want. And what do most people do with it? Watch television.
The average American, by the age of 60 has watched 15 years (1/4 their life; 4 hours a day) of television.
People ask me, wide-eyed, shocked and unbelieving, “How can you live without a television? To be honest, I never have a good answer. But please answer me this:
“How can you LIVE, (in ever sense of the word: live life), with one?”
cheers.
Dan Brown – The Lost Symbol – September 15th, 2009 – Finally!
Apr 21st

I read a few hundred books a year, don’t much care for fiction. I loved what I heard from Gov. Walker once “You learn to read so you can read to learn”. Not to be endlessly distracted from the crappy life you’ve created and you don’t want to face. I say that, but I was sort of resentful for the education system. All of the books they recommended were boring, and I think the education system forgot the reason why they were trying to make us read. All of the books I love now were never introduced to me in any school curriculumn. There is a varity of book catagories for a reason, why not read a few of the best sellings books from each catagory instread of trying to cram down history or 18th century literary “classics”. Anyways, I do love Dan Brown. Davinci Code – Masterpiece. I have been anticipating this next release for years. Angels & Demons was excellent as well. It’s called The Lost Symbol





